September 14th, 2007
Goodall & Loose Change on Webnation #13
March 14th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (39)
Posted by: Philip Crow | around 11 months ago
Interesting, my PETA family reads all about her stuff. The whole loose change thing, ugh, inside job, yeah right. Tin hat theory of epic proportions.
Posted by: Charlie | around 11 months ago
Hope your not buying that loose change bull crap.
Posted by: Amber Mac | around 11 months ago
I really enjoyed the Jane Goodall interview, such an amazing woman. As for Loose Change, it's always interesting to see someone else's side of the story!
Posted by: Philip Roy | around 11 months ago
The RSS feed has an incorrect link....the show's not come through in iTunes either, but I managed to figure out what it should be linking to.... http://cache.libsyn.com/commandn/sep1307-webnation.m4v Hope that helps.
Posted by: Ryan | around 11 months ago
Great show! I noticed commercial breaks... is this on TV up there in Canada? If so I am so jealous.
Posted by: Mike | around 11 months ago
Amber, I hope you learned something from your interview with Dylan Avery. It's refreshing that you gave him a chance to tell his side of the story without dismissing it out of hand. I urge you to investigate it yourself, read the evidence, and you'll see that the 911 Truth movement is not composed of crazies. Check out Alex Jones, http://www.prisonplanet.com . Watch his movie TerrorStorm, I assure you it's worth the time. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm&total=841&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Posted by: Amber Mac | around 11 months ago
@Ryan - yes, it's on TV - Citytv (actually, CP24) - but I think our biggest audience is online. @Mike - thx for the links, will check 'em out!
Posted by: John | around 11 months ago
Glad that you had the Loose Change guy on. Perhaps it will motivate someone to look into the real conspiracy which is the people who made up the whole conspiracy in the first place. I don't believe they are "crazies" either, just people whose world view doesn't allow them to accept the fact that anything/anyone other than capitalists/the USA could do "evil". Their only way to cope is to make up stuff. The simplest way to discredit this grand conspiracy is to look at how long Dick Cheney was able to hide the fact that he shot a member of his hunting party. And to address something that was shown twice in the show, something to the effect of "why is the damage to the Pentagon inconsistent with a 757 crashing into it?" WTF? A passenger jet is essentially a thin metal tube loaded with fuel, not a solid piece of metal which the conspiracy theorists like to imply with their mention of the total weight of the plane. I've seen video of a jetliner crashing into a solid concrete wall at much lower speed to simulate an attack on a nuclear power plant's walls, with less fuel and it did little damage to the wall at all. I'm surprised the 757 did that much damage to the Pentagon, not that it should have done more, like the tin hatters would have you believe.
Posted by: Selvy | around 11 months ago
I just posted Maddox's website link on his view of these "Loose Change" types. It's good to hear the other side, to be sure, if only as a reminder of how far away one wants to stay from the edge of reality.
Posted by: Selvy | around 11 months ago
Whoops, here: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons It's hilarious.
Posted by: Leila Boujnane | around 11 months ago
Amber, Great episode!
Posted by: eric | around 11 months ago
is web nation available in iPod video format?
Posted by: ConsDemo | around 11 months ago
Amber, Avery's movie is a piece of garbage. If you want to see an excellent rebuttal of previous release of “Loose Change†go to: http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/ Most of the supporters of these conspiracy theories are simply anti-American. If one examines their “evidence†closely, they mostly seize on anomalies in any traumatic event and somehow claim it is “proof†9/11 was “an inside job.†They will often try to cloak their beliefs in “science,†yet very few of them have any real expertise. They had a former physics professor named Steven Jones, who also claims he proved Jesus came to North America, say the Twin Towers were brought down by a “controlled demolition†yet they can find no one who saw or took part in what would have been an elaborate process that would have taken weeks to arrange. Dylan Avery is in this for his own fame and personal gain. He wanted to produce a “fictional project†and he succeeded. The conspiratoids have found a bit of a following because the current Administration is so unpopular that people some people are willing to accept any criticism of it, no matter how outrageous. While the Administration deserves criticism for many things, perpetrating 9/11 is one of them, rather, it is a stupid distraction. The so-called “9/11 truth†movement is driven by dishonesty, stupidity and hate, not facts.
Posted by: Dylan Avery | around 11 months ago
And let the hating begin! Amber, thanks for having me on the show. I hope some people realize I'm just an average American looking for the same answers the family members are survivors are. But, then again, there'll always be people like "ConsDemo" who stick to ad hominems.
Posted by: glen | around 11 months ago
Great interview. Too many questions were left unanswered by our government. Thanks for discussing this very important topic.
Posted by: glen | around 11 months ago
people can't imagine that our own government would hurt it's own people but history shows that this exact thing has happened many times before. If you simply look at how our government has treated the clean-up workers of 911 and you'll see they don't care about us. They're know different than a corporation just concerned with their own agenda.
Posted by: Free Truth | around 11 months ago
Thanks for covering 9/11 truth. I am downloading the episode right now because I saw a mention on 911blogger.com For me, the most obvious (of many) holes in the Official Conspiracy Theory is the mysterious collapse / implosion of WTC building 7 in 6.6 seconds. Gravitational free fall would be 6 seconds meaning that 47 floors of steel gave almost no resistance. There is only one way that this is possible without violating the laws of physics, and that is controlled demolition. Peace through truth.
Posted by: ConsDemo | around 11 months ago
Dylan, you don't have much room to complain. You accuse others of perpetrating mass murder on no evidence whatsoever; pointing out that your claims are dishonest and driven by hate is pretty pale by comparison. "Free truth", who made you an authority on “the laws of physics� Stop spreading lies about WTC7. If anyone wants the facts about the collapse of that building, don’t listen to conspiracy theory nonsense, here is a real explanation. http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/wtc7videoincludingeastmechanicalpenthous
Posted by: Mark David Sirhan Bin Oswald Ray Jr. | around 11 months ago
God, the anti-Truth trolls are here already! Ignore them, Amber, they are the price you pay for doing your job well. Thanks so much for this piece. Some day Peter Mansbridge will be sweeping up litter and you will be a trusted voice. By the way, Dr David Ray Griffin, one of the leading thinkers in the Truth movement, is apparently to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize this year.
Posted by: Hunter S. Thompson | around 11 months ago
Marvin P. Bush, the president's younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served. According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down." The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up... "Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower." Marvin Bush was in New York on 9/11.
Posted by: ConsDemo | around 11 months ago
Again, Amber, contrast the post by "Hunter S. Thompson" with reality. Even if the conspiracy claims about Marvin Bush were true, they wouldn't necessarily prove anything. However, as usual, the claims aren't true. Here is real background on Marvin Bush and the WTC. http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change-3#marvin-bush-securacom-and-the-sec The conspiracy theorists basically twist facts or just plain make up their "evidence."
Posted by: John Smith | around 11 months ago
http://www.wtc7.net/ http://911research.wtc7.net/ http://www.ae911truth.org/ http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.stj911.org/ No "conspiracy theory"; just research. Read David Ray Griffin's "Debunking 9/11 Debunking". It eviscerates all of the main attempts to explain away the 9/11 Truth Movement's questions, namely those of NIST and Popular Mechanics. NIST is an agency of the Department of Commerce, so it is an agency of the Bush Administration. It depends on funding from the Bush Administration. Conflict of interest? Read the book, and if your beliefs about 9/11 are not shaken thereafter I'll just shut up.
Posted by: Steve Johnson | around 11 months ago
Yes, I thought it was foolish too, until I saw the video of World Trade Center 7 falling. This is by far the greatest smoking gun of the 9/11 controversy. It is absolutely physically impossible for that building to fall symmetrically in 6-7 seconds (free fall speed) because it had a couple of small fires. This never, ever happens to steel frame buildings due to fire. Some people confuse this building with the twin towers. It is actually some distance away and housed several major government agencies including the CIA and FBI. This is an obvious controlled demolition, and had to be set up weeks ahead of 9/11.
Posted by: Alison Murphy | around 11 months ago
Amber, what you are doing is so important! I'm stunned! This is fascinating stuff. The world needs more people like you.
Posted by: Julie | around 11 months ago
Great news! Four star general Wesley Clark stated that we need a new investigation into 9/11. Geez, even the 9/11 commissioners said the government was so deceitful they almost sent the entire case to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution! In their own words! Get a clue little people! Wake up from your media-induced hallucinations!
Posted by: Marco Wren | around 11 months ago
thanks for giving unbiased airtime to Dylan Avery to briefly discuss his upcoming movie. Hopefully it will break loose from being a popular internet movie and bust out into the mainstream. World trade centre 7 is the smoking gun. A HUGE bulding collapsed at near freefall speed. Silverstein who profited hugely from the false flag operation attacks even admited their demolition. How was this building rigged with explosives within just a few hours of that whole area being turned into a war zone?? Free your mind people - investigate!!! Don't believe George Bush's conspiracy theories - believe the truth!
Posted by: Muddy W | around 11 months ago
Eric...9/11 Truth includes many conservative academics, scientists. professional pilots including a Top Gun, military officers, and intel pro's CIA FBI etc-hardly anti-American "tin hat types" -it is the participation of people of all political persuations that convinces me this is legitimate-plus-what did happen to those huge Titanium steel engines on the "plane" that hit the Pentagon-without mussing up the lawn and missing huge spools of cable?
Posted by: Danny S | around 11 months ago
There are hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of discrepancies in the "official story" of 911. Hundreds. I implore each and every person to PLEASE research for themselves. Watch Loose Change, then: Zeitgeist and 911: Press for Truth. Must see's! And to Ms. Amber Mac, I had never heard of you until I was linked to this video. I am extremely impressed by your objectivity, you have a new fan. Rock the fuck on!
Posted by: Jude | around 11 months ago
I just watched the season finale of dotboom...it all makes sense now. LOL ;)
Posted by: David Oyog | around 11 months ago
Talking about Twin Towers and Building 7 going down? Some people must be paid to debunk the truth. Let me ask you this question? Can fire break steel and turn concrete to powder? If you answer no then you are right. In the history of buildings made with steel and concrete never has a building of steel and concrete gone down because of fire. What can cause steel to break and turn concrete to powder? Explosives. Why did Building 7 go down? No airplane hit that building. Why did it have to be destroyed? Was there something in the building that had to be destroyed. If one was to set off the bombs in the Twin Towers by radio signal Building 7 would be perfect for that. On one floor of Building 7 was put in bullet proof glass. Why only on one floor? Was that the floor where they set off by radio signal the 1000's of bombs placed just right so the steel beams would be about 30 feet long. Perfect for a truck to haul them off just like in demolition. The bullet proof glass would protect them that are setting off the radio controlled bombs. They keep finding small body parts on the tops of buildings surrounding the Twin Towers. These bombs murdered thousands and their body parts are still being found. Body parts don't fly out of buildings cause of fire. No but explosives can shoot body parts on the roofs of near by buildings. So is this why they pulled Building 7? http://tracypress.com/content/view/11246/2244/
Posted by: Breeze | around 11 months ago
Thank you for doing a feature on Loose Change. I can't wait to see the final cut. Hopefully this will be the film to spark the true revolution and remove the criminals from the Government.
Posted by: ken | around 11 months ago
All these haters can do is post SLC and the maddox web site..pathetic..really..great job Amber! 9/11 Was An Inside Job!
Posted by: Ernest Blake | around 11 months ago
Loved the show! A little clumsy in the graphics but the features rocked and the format caught and held attention. Good treatment of TWO OF MY FAVORITE FOLKS! And whether Jane or Dylan is more revolutionary is the next question!
Posted by: Richard Harris | around 10 months ago
Thank you so much for your review of loose change. Great work, I really appreciate you taking these issues seriously, as the mainstream media has not. We need to find out what really happened on 9-11, it is the basis for the war on terror, and it has NOT been solved. - Please people, lets get active in calling for a new investigation, before another attack of this nature occurs.
Posted by: kerry | around 9 months ago
you punks need to grow up and take your heads out of your asses. only fools would think like you do.
Posted by: WWW.INFOWARS.NET | around 9 months ago
Great episode! thanks for bringing the loose change guys on
Posted by: rick shadow | around 9 months ago
Amber, Thanks for taking the time to present Loose Change 911 in an unbiased, objective interview. I've been following them for quite a while and it's refreshing to see a decent take on the issue
Posted by: ned | around 9 months ago
thanks amber, nice episode i liked the bit about 9/11 really go me thinking x
Posted by: MIchael | around 11 months ago
The RSS feed (http://feeds.feedburner.com/webnation) does not have the enclosed file and the link (http://media.libsyn.com/media/commandn/sep307-webnation.m4v) goes to a 404 error.